Rona THUNDERBLAST 10/23/22

Rona THUNDERBLAST 10/23/22 

Catherine Austin Fits: "What we're watching is a general poisoning, and it's very serious — and it's intentional." 

This story which was released by the Epoch Times a year ago is as relevant today as it was a year ago. The evidence is there. The evidence is crystal clear that Fauci funded the work leading to SARS-CoV-2. 

A team of just two reporters at the Epoch Times uncovered a complete timeline of events. 

The reporter noted: if the Epoch Times can uncover all of this, imagine what Congress could find with its large staff and discovery powers. 

Maybe someday they will take a look 

Surprise! EcoHealth Landed $1 Million Grant To Work With '80% Mouse Death' Boston University On 'Future Pandemic Prevention 


Fact checkers aren’t checking facts in these unexplained cardiac deaths. Their job is to promote the “safe and effective” false narrative. 

Fact checkers (such as Ciara O’Rourke of PolitiFact) who claim that the vaccine didn’t cause the death of a person (in this case, Ray Liotta) can only make that claim if either: 

The autopsy actually did the proper stains to look for vaccine involvement and found nothing. But only one pathologist in the US is doing these stains and in 100% of the cases he’s looked at so far, the vaccine was implicated in the death. 
The family says that the deceased was never vaccinated with the COVID vaccine 

Have you ever seen a sudden cardiac death since 2021 where either of the two conditions above were satisfied? I haven’t. 

O’Rourke basically relies on the statement of Jennifer Allen, Ray Liotta’s publicist to determine the cause of his untimely death: 

"The family has not released the cause of death yet, but I do know the cause, and (it) has nothing to do with COVID or the vaccine," she told us in an email. 

O’Rourke never describes Allen’s medical credentials. Why not? 


Criminal Insanity: The European Medicines Agency Recommends Approval of COVID Jabs for BABIES 

One in Every 500 Small Children Who Receive the Pfizer Vaccine is Hospitalised By It 

Young children were significantly more likely to have side effects following mRNA Covid jabs than after other vaccines, German researchers reported Tuesday. 

The children were also more likely to have severe side effects. Of 7,800 children under five who received mRNA shots, 10 required hospitalization afterwards. 

No children who received other shots needed hospitalization. 

The German study, which examined Pfizer’s mRNA shots, adds to little-noticed and troubling safety data from Moderna’s own clinical trial of its mRNA jab in children under 5. The reports come even as a federal vaccine advisory committee meets today to consider adding the mRNA shots to the standard childhood vaccine schedule and paving the way for states to require them for school. 

Moderna has never published or publicized its clinical trial safety data, which showed that 24 out of fewer than 4,800 children suffered a serious adverse event, such as a high fever or swelling of four inches or more, following the shot. 

The rate of 1 in 200 was nearly three times higher than the rate in kids who received a placebo shot. The gap was particularly notable in children under 2; 15 of the 1800 children that age who received the shot had an adverse event, compared to one of the 600 who received a placebo. 

One who received the Moderna vaccine suffered a fever so high that he had a seizure, which investigators said was related to the vaccine. 



Despite immense blowback over its vote on Wednesday, the CDC’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices voted unanimously on Thursday to add COVID shots to its recommended schedule of vaccinations for children and adults. 

The vaccine schedule now calls for children to begin Covid mRNA shots when they are 6 months old. After a brief comment period, the panel of medical specialists voted with 15 in favor and none against. 

A CDC spokesperson said that regardless of how the ACIP votes, the decision does not alter official policy. 

"It’s important to note that there are no changes in COVID-19 vaccine policy, and this action would simply help streamline clinical guidance for healthcare providers by including all currently licensed, authorized and routinely recommended vaccines in one document," the spokesperson said. 

While the CDC denies that the new vaccination schedule is only a recommendation, the reality is that states and public school districts around the country will take the committee's recommended schedule and automatically adopt it. 

"ACIP (committee) just voted 15:0 to add COVID jabs to 2023 childhood immunization schedule," Rep. Thomas Massie tweeted. "This will precipitate c-19 vax mandates to attend schools and play sports in many states. Has an EUA shot with so many serious recorded side effects ever been added to this list before?" 


Big Covid news week. 

Along with the Centers for Disease Control’s effort to normalize Covid vaccines for kids and the German paper showing just how terrible an idea that would be, a big Japanese paper finds myocarditis deaths double in the four weeks after vaccination. 

And then we have Dr. Anthony Fauci’s calendar for the winter of 2020. 

A group called “Open The Books” just pried it out of the National Institute of Health’s cold dead hands. You might have heard of Tony - he’s America’s Doctor and apparently in mortal danger from this Substack. (Just ask Dr. Scott Gottlieb, Pfizer board member, Twitter correspondent, and all-around good guy. Whatever happened to sticks and stones may break my bones but words will never hurt me? For that matter, whatever happened to the First Amendment?) 

But I digress. 

The point is we now can peek at Tony’s calendar from November 2019 through March 2020. 

Don’t get too excited. A lot of the good stuff is very heavily redacted, like the famous Feb. 1 meeting with Jeremy Farrar at which Tony and the boys definitely did NOT concoct a cover story for the origins of Sars-Cov-2, which definitely did NOT leak from a Chinese lab in Wuhan that America’s Doctor had been funding through Peter Daszak and the EcoHealth Alliance. 

Again I digress! So many conspiracies, so little time. 

And a lot of what’s left on the calendar is what you would expect - many, many media hits, including Steph Curry’s podcast (they are both undersized point guards, after all, so much to talk about) and the now sadly canceled Desus and Mero show. 

Plus separate meetings with Stephane Bancel and Stephen Hahn of Moderna, the NIH’s partner in crime - I mean vaccine development, lol! James LeDuc and Ralph Baric, who might have known a thing or two about what the Bat Lady was up to in Wuhan, show up too. 

But maybe the most interesting tidbit of all shows up at 8:30 a.m. on February 27: 
A pre-print study released today reports that the genomic patterns they have observed in SARS-CoV-2 are most likely to have occurred due to synthetic genome assembly rather than natural evolution. They say that the patterns are consistent with previously engineered viruses and are unlikely to have evolved from other coronaviruses. They report that there is a high likelihood that SARS-CoV-2 may have originated as an infectious clone assembled in vitro. 

Alex Washburne, one of the co-authors, said they studied a common method for synthesizing coronaviruses in labs. The method was thought not to leave a fingerprint but he claims to have found the fingerprint in the genome. 

He goes on to explain that to create a virus in a lab your need a 30kb DNA clone to make a 30kb RNA virus. To make the clone, smaller fragments are glued together, often using the Golden Gate assembly method. This method makes special “cutting” sites in the DNA sequence which in turn create “sticky ends”. This is the glue that attaches the various segments together. 

In wild viruses, these stitched together areas happen at random parts throughout the genome. However, the authors analysed published clones from between 2000 and 2019 and found that there was a pattern, as to where these sticky ends appear, in chimeric, lab built viruses. 

Man alive! Surely this is not what NSW Health is going for? 



Would you look at the risk multiplier on that. People with 4+ doses of Covid vaccination are 2.1 x more likely than the average punter to wind up dead with Covid. 

It’s not looking any better for the 4+ dosed in hospitalisations and ICU admissions either. 


If the data keep going this way, the public’s relationship with NSW Health is going to get very strained. They keep telling us that Covid vaccines prevent severe illness and death. NSW Secretary Susan Pearce says that the ICU data shows this,irrefutably. I’ve lodged an FOIR for that mystery data because the only publicly available data tells a different story altogether. 

As for the unvaccinated - as Joel from Dead Man Talking says, they simply aren’t dying enough. 

This is very bad for The Narrative™️. 

To get current, deaths with Covid in the most recently reported surveillance week (ending 15 October) were split: 

4+ dose 53.3% 
3 dose 16.7% 
Combined 3 and 4+ dose 70% 
2 dose 13.3% 
1 dose 0% 
0 dose 6.7% 
Unknown 10% 

This is where vaccination coverage is at across the whole population. 0 dose column added by me: 



We have 19.4% of the NSW population 4+ dosed, accounting for 53.3% of deaths with Covid. I’m trying to think of a way to spin this for vaccine effectiveness but, no, I’ve got nothing. 

What this looks like is negative vaccine effectiveness. I am not qualified to make the case for this claim, but Dr Ah Kahn Syed is, and he makes it convincingly: 

96 doctors in Quebec are sacrificing their careers to speak out! Here’s the summary: 


See the full story here. This is progress! 

COVID data repository 

There is a nice repository of COVID related info here. 

80 young doctors in Canada have died since the vax rollout 

Here’s a story about the 80 doctor deaths in Canadacollected by William Makis. I called Bill and asked him if he’s heard back from the CMA on the letter he wrote them. “Of course not!” 

Canadians are rejecting the booster 

And a story about how people in Ontario are rejecting the booster. They are no longer blindly following insane medical advice. This is more evidence that things just aren’t going as planned. 

Think about it… only 16% are getting the jabs despite the fact that there is no safety data available! 

Now, you’d expect that since there is no safety data available, that there would be 100% compliance wouldn’t you? After all, we are talking NO safety data! 


The 16% compliance rate is a sign of intelligent life in Ontario. 

I’m not sure what the officials there will do now. Perhaps switch ad agencies? 

63k people had died within 7 weeks of receiving a Booster COVID Vaccine Dose in England between January & March 2022 – The Expose ( 

According to the UK Government institution, the Office for National Statistics (ONS), between January and March 2022, 62,801 people had sadly died within an average of 48 days after receiving a booster dose of the Covid-19 injection no later than 31st December 2021, and 4,781 of those deaths were attributed to Covid-19. 
In an extraordinary rejection of the CDC’s recommendation yesterday, 11 governors have announced they won’t be adding the Covid vaccine to the list of required vaccines for children to attend school in their states. 

Nine are Republicans and two are Democrats. 

The Republican governors are: 

Gov. Ron DeSantis (Florida) 

Gov. Kim Reynolds (Iowa) 

Gov. Bill Lee (Tennessee) 

Gov. Kay Ivey (Alabama) 

Gov. Spencer Cox (Utah) 

Gov. Kristi Noem (South Dakota) 

Gov. Kevin Stitt (Oklahoma) 

Gov. Glenn Youngkin (Virginia) 

Gov. Mike Parson (Missouri) 

The two Democrat governors are: 

Gov. Jared Polis (Colorado) 

Gov. Ned Lamont (Connecticut) 


Executive summary 

A new study shows that nearly everyone getting the mRNA COVID vaccines are experiencing some amount of heart damage. 


Watch this episode from Vinay Prasad before YouTube censors it. 

U.K. Regulator Mulls Covid Vaccination for Babies Despite High Injury Rate – as Moderna Trial Finds Vaccine Can Cause Diabetes in Infants – The Daily Sceptic 

Injecting babies means more $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$, so we must do it.  Nothing matters, but more money. We need it and have to have more.  It is never enough.  Give it to me. Now!!!! 

-Bill Gates 
A previous study published in October 2021from Sweden found that the spike protein enters our cells’ nuclei and impairs the mechanism our cells have to repair damaged DNA. We’ve included this study here as The Highwire made an easy-to-understand video explaining it, including graphics, and so it is a good starting point to help understand the significance of the latest study from Sweden. 

Earlier Studies 

Preclinical animal studies of the Pfizer/BioNTech Covid mRNA injection (BNT162b2) showed reversible effects on the livers of rats including: enlarged liver, vacuolation and increased enzyme levels (γGT, AST, ALP).  In the assessment report on BNT162b2 provided to EMA by Pfizer, studies in rats demonstrated that the contents do not stay at the injection site and a relatively large proportion (up to 18%) of the total “vaccine” dose ends up in the liver. 

Another study in May 2021 by MIT scientists showed that SARS-CoV-2 RNA can be reverse transcribed and integrated into the genome of human cells and expressed as chimeric transcripts.  Although no one from corporate media or corporate science seemed to ask at the time, the findings of this study give rise to the question of whether this same reverse transcription may also occur with RNA in Covid injections. 

ABC 10 News reported on the MIT study shortly after it was published. 

ABC 10 News: Study suggests Covid-19 can alter DNA, 13 May 2021 (3 mins) 

What is Reverse Transcription? 

Pictures speak a thousand words and so rather than try to write an explanation we found a video which introduces the mechanism of reverse transcription of HIV, a retrovirus.  It may be a little dated and overly simplistic but it illustrates how HIV infects a cell and replicates itself using reverse transcriptase and the host’s cellular machinery. 

HHMI BioInteractive: HIV Life Cycle, 5 October 2016 (5 mins) 

The First Study of Reverse Transcription of Injection Spike Proteins 

Because of the findings of the animal studies and the MIT study, a group of Swedish scientists from Lund University conducted a study to investigate the effect the Pfizer/BioNTech injection (BNT162b2) had on human liver cells and if Pfizer’s encoded spike protein RNA can be reverse transcribed into DNA. The study, ‘Intracellular Reverse Transcription of Pfizer BioNTech COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine BNT162b2 In Vitro in Human Liver Cell Line’, was published on 25 February 2022. 

“In this study, we investigated the effect of BNT162b2 on the human liver cell line Huh7 in vitro,” the study authors wrote. 

The study found that the mRNA injection is able to enter the human liver cell line Huh7 and that the injections’ mRNA is reverse transcribed into DNA as fast as six hours after the cells were exposed to it. 

“A possible mechanism for reverse transcription is through endogenous [intracellular] reverse transcriptase LINE-1, and the nucleus protein distribution of LINE-1 is elevated by BNT162b2,” the study authors wrote. 

“Huh cells are ‘immortal’ liver tumour cells and grow ad-infinitum if you give them love,” Jessica Rose explained, “LINE-1 is a reverse transcriptase that we carry and comprises ~17% of our genome!” 

“Our study shows that [Pfizer’s mRNA injection] … can be reverse transcribed to DNA … and this may give rise to the concern if [injection]-derived DNA may be integrated into the host genome and affect the integrity of genomic DNA, which may potentially mediate genotoxic side effects.” 





Intracellular Reverse Transcription of Pfizer BioNTech COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine BNT162b2 In Vitro in Human Liver Cell Line, Discussion section, Alden et al, Lund University, Sweden, 25 February 2022 
Critics have long questioned why the National Institutes of Health (NIH) would fund experiments by University of North Carolina of Chapel Hill (UNC) professor Ralph Baric to develop a technique for hiding evidence of human tampering in laboratory-created super viruses. 

Aided by some $220.5 million in National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) funding, Baric developed a so-called “Seamless Ligation” technique, which he boasted could perfectly conceal all evidence of human tampering in laboratory-created viruses. Baric nicknamed his invention the “no-see’m” method. 

Now a new study, “Endonuclease fingerprint indicates a synthetic origin of SARS-CoV2,” published on the preprint server bioRxiv, shows that — apparently unbeknownst to Baric — the “seamless ligation” concealment gimmick leaves its own minute but legible signature. 

Most momentously, these same researchers have discovered that damning signature in the genome of the virus that causes COVID-19. 

Baric’s technique has long been controversial. “It’s the artist that doesn’t sign his name to the painting; the virologist that doesn’t put his signature into the virus to let us know whether or not it is emerging naturally or whether it is produced in a laboratory,” said Jeffrey Sachs, chair of The Lancet COVID-19 Commission, a task force that investigated the origins of COVID-19. 

“All of it says, my God, there was really a big, very risky research agenda underway.” 

This month, Sachs published the results of his 22-month investigation in The Lancet, including the damaging conclusion that COVID-19 was probably laboratory-generated and that the technology probably came from NIH-funded science. 

Referring to Baric’s seamless ligation methodology, evolutionary biologist Bret Weinstein observed: 

“It’s the exact opposite of what you would do if your interest was public health. Public health scientists would be marking their enhancements with red flags — not devising ways to hide them. The only reason you would want a concealer is to advance a sinister purpose — such as illegal bioweapons development — some mischief that the scientist didn’t want traceable back to his lab.” 

Baric taught his “no-see’m” method to the Wuhan Institute of Virology’s (WIV) “Bat Lady” Shi Zhengli in 2016. In return, Baric received Chinese coronaviruses collected by Shi from bats in Yunnan province. (Scientists have linked the COVID-19 genome’s pedigree to closely related bats.) 

The last shred of hope for holding Big Pharma accountable for fraud now rests on a lawsuit against vaccine manufacturer Pfizer. In an update provided to Wildfire News, a judge is soon expected to issue his ruling on whether or not the 'Pfizergate' fraud case proceeds to trial. 

"The judge is deciding, as I type, whether we go to discovery or the case is dismissed," Pfizer whistleblower Brook Jackson tells Wildfire News. 

After the CDC this week voted to add the Covid shots to its Childhood Vaccines Schedule, under the PREP Act, it has effectively been granted legal immunity to lawsuits. There is no legal immunity if Pfizer committed fraud, however. 

In September, Pfizer whistleblower Brook Jackson came forward with her explosive report about the company's alleged malfeasance, citing ‘falsified data’ and manipulated clinical trials.  In January, she filed a lawsuit against Pfizer for committing fraud against the American people,  In February, the judge ruled that the lawsuit, being led by attorney Robert Barnes, can proceed to pre-trial discovery phase. It is now on the verge of potentially going to trial. 

Brook Jackson is a former clinical trial auditor who was fired after raising her concerns. She first came forward with inside information and documented evidence about Pfizer’s operations in a BMJ investigation conducted by Paul Thacker. The report raises serious red flags that the FDA and Pfizer engaged in massive fraud to justify vaccine mandates. 

"A regional director who was employed at the research organisation Ventavia Research Group has told The BMJ that the company falsified data, unblinded patients, employed inadequately trained vaccinators, and was slow to follow up on adverse events reported in Pfizer’s pivotal phase III trial," the BMJ reported. "Staff who conducted quality control checks were overwhelmed by the volume of problems they were finding. After repeatedly notifying Ventavia of these problems, the regional director, Brook Jackson (video 1), emailed a complaint to the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Ventavia fired her later the same day. Jackson has provided The BMJ with dozens of internal company documents, photos, audio recordings, and emails." 

"Jackson has told The BMJ that, during the two weeks she was employed at Ventavia in September 2020, she repeatedly informed her superiors of poor laboratory management, patient safety concerns, and data integrity issues," the report added. "Jackson was a trained clinical trial auditor who previously held a director of operations position and came to Ventavia with more than 15 years’ experience in clinical research coordination and management." 

The U.S. government has moved to dismiss the case, which cites the False Claims Act. 

"The United States remains a real party in interest in this suit under the False Claims Act, even though it has not intervened in the case.," the motion states. "The False Claims Act is the primary statute on which the Federal Government relies to combat fraud against the public fisc and to recover taxpayer dollars lost to fraud or false claims. The Government therefore has a substantial interest in the development of the law in this area and in the correct application of that law in this and similar cases. While fraud on the Food and Drug Administration or the failure to comply with clinical trial protocols could potentially give rise to False Claims Act liability in an appropriate case, in the instant case the complaint does not plead a sufficient nexus between the alleged clinical trial violations and the alleged requests for payment from the Government to support such liability." 

As related by one legal analyst, "Pfizer’s core argument in its Motion to Dismiss, which the US Government has now endorsed in its Oct. 4 statement of interest, is that clinical trials and clinical data from all of the sites, including the serious adverse event reports from the very start of the trials in Summer 2020, were not “material” or “necessary” to the FDA’s decisions to grant Emergency Use Authorization (Dec. 11, 2020) and approval (Aug. 23, 2021) to Pfizer’s product."

Leave a comment